On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 03:34:51PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think that might be more confusing. For small updates the progress
> would start at 90% or so. It is probably better to use

> What do you think.

The progress starts at 0% with the meta-files (Release, Packages,
Sources, Contents) (and stays at 0% during that time). I think counting
this data, too, would give a more useful progress report. you can
see which amount of data already got downloaded when the package
download starts.

    Ingo
-- 
/* Why waste time? -- asuffield */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to