Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> writes: hi Bas, hi debian-gis members,
> On 10/20/2014 11:17 PM, Felix Natter wrote: >> Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net> writes: >>> => I think we need to investigate that for jessie+1, but now I think we >>> should parse the "attribution data" and use the included link to >>> download the logo at runtime (many thanks to the patch [1] from Marcus >>> Lundblad <m...@update.uu.se> and Martin Krüger <martin.krue...@gmx.com>)? >>> We should really agree on something now ;-) >> >> --> Can we all agree on this solution for jessie? >> (which is probably legal if JMapViewer itself is legal) >> >> I'd suggest to apply this patch now to make sure it's fixed for jessie! > > Yes, until we hear otherwise it seems to me the best solution to the > Bing logo license problem. > > I've cleaned up the patch a little and added DEP3 headers for inclusion > in the jmapviewer package. When the patch is forwarded upstream we have > a nice opportunity to get the upstream point of view on this issue. Thanks for your help! I pushed the change to jmapviewer git and tested with josm (and freeplane). Don Armstrong wrote: > At the very least, I'd stick a note in NEWS.Debian.gz. => Do we really want to do this? I think that problematic bing support is not quite new for this package? @Andreas: Could you sponsor this tomorrow? Cheers and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
