On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 07:30:59PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 07:38:35PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > You noted in #340278 that your bug subscriptions had no functional > > effect. Could you check if this is still the case? > > How can I without sending test messages to other people's bug reports? There's a bug about that (#129856: "bugs.debian.org: Please provide a BTS pseudopackage with which to test/learn the BTS") :)
Why not use this bug, though? (#340278). > Unfortunately, the handful of bugs that I have subscribed to did not > have any traffic recently. > > >I would suggest > > to (attempt to) resubscribe to the relevant bugs, if it doesn't work > > initially. > > I resubscribed to 319583, and the system didn't complain that I am > already subscribed. I don't know that it would complain (wishlist bug). Maybe you are subscribed twice (normal bug IMO). > However, I have a confirmation message on file that my subscription > from November 1st was successful as well. Maybe you got unsubscribed for some reason, such as: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00000.html or any problem which might have happened during the initial deployment of bug subscription. > > I know that I have seen evidence of bug subscription working. > > I have, as well. My subscription to #333205 works fine. Does that mean that this bug can be closed? I'd rather not do so if there is any evidence of subscription not working, though. -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
