On 09/10/2014 18:52, Wookey wrote: > +++ Sylvestre Ledru [2014-10-09 18:36 +0200]: >> On 09/10/2014 18:29, Wookey wrote: >>> I think we are talking at cross-purposes here. You are talking about >>> the debugger, I am talking about the whole package. If 3.4 is best not >>> used on arm64, then why are we building it at all on this >>> arch. Because cross-compilers (i.e used of 3.4 but other back-ends)? >>> Because build-deps? >>> >>> Similar questions for 3.3. >>> >> OK. My bad :) >> >> I don't have any opinion on this. I am not restricting the arch in the >> packaging. >> But you have to know that there are packages explicitly depending on 3.4 >> (ghc for example). > OK, well if ghc needs it and it does in fact build then clearly we > should be building it. So yes, go ahead with the fixed upload. Cheers > for the speedy responses. building :) > Once that builds then llvm-defaults should work too, I presume. FYI, llvm-defaults should already work since the default is now 3.5! >> About 3.3, see bug 753965 > OK, that's going away, which if good from my POV :-) > mine too ;)
S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
