Hi,

Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'll try to document this in the next version, but not in the README
> as it has been suggested. This deserves a place in the copyright file
> itself, below the line saying "The GNU Public Licenses [...]".

I must admit, I haven't looked in the debian/copyright file, but I
think someone on IRC had that idea, too.

Another thing which I think would solve this issue easily, but which
may have some side effects I'm not yet aware of, would be to rename
the file to "Artistic-1.0-Perl" (or whatever) and make "Artistic" a
symlink to it, analogous how it's done for the different GPL versions.

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to