Hi Markus,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:48:05PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 09.10.2014 12:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [...]
> > That's since the current code to parse the tasks files is not using
> > deb822 reader (from debian import deb822). The tasks files are no
> > control files but they follow dep822 format (as for instance
> > debian/control files). It is pure lack that the blends-dev tools are
> > more tolerant here.
>
> I'd call that a bug. :)
OK, last year there was a GSoC project to rewrite the Blends tool anyway.[1]
I just did not implemented it before the Jessie freeze. When bringing this
into effect the bug will be closed.
> >> The requirement for an extra empty line seems to be neither documented
> >> nor enforced currently.
> >
> > Perhaps the documentation part is to weak.
>
> Wishlist bug report is in the works.
:-)
Thanks. Sounds reasonable.
> >> I also don't see a reason why the latter should
> >> be necessary since both options work appropriately. Is this really a
> >> problem?
> >
> > If you do not believe me have a look at the tasks pages. :-)
>
> Yeah, _that's_ a problem. I will revert the change and file two bug
> reports against blends-dev.
Patches for #764591 are really welcome.
Thanks for your helpful feedback
Andreas.
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=blends/blends.git
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
