i'm not sure what the atmel adjustments are. from what i can see they just package up the upstream avr-libc.
if you look at the source from atmel, there doesn't appear to be any patches, it just looks like upstream avr-libc: http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/Atmel-AVR-GNU-Toolchain/3.4.4/ i've CC'd the contact address quoted in the README to possibly clarify. regards. On 08/10/14 13:21, Hakan Ardo wrote: > Is it that so? Are all Atmel adjustments included in the 1.8.1? > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Simon John <g...@the-jedi.co.uk> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> is there any update on this? Would it be possible to pull in the header? >> >> Why are we using the Atmel patches? Its going to be a long time before >> we get avr-libc 1.8.1 that way. >> >> For a couple of years avr-libc upstream looked a bit dead so Atmel was >> the only choice, but now I'd say upstream have overtaken Atmel again. >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> On 23/09/14 07:19, Hakan Ardo wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> thanx for the report. I suppose we could pull in a single header file >>> from avr-libc trunk if the general consensus is that the Atmel version >>> is in a bad state. >>> >>> Aurelien, you been pushing for using the Atmel patches. Can you see >>> any issues with this? Thanx. -- Simon John https://github.com/sej7278 g...@the-jedi.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
