Hi Michael, Not Thijs here, but I think can also comment on this:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:09:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 08:49:46PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On its own, I would not consider failure to lock the screen in specific > > situations a high priority issue because of the other consequences of > > having physical access to a machine. Normally I would suggest to fix the > > bug through the regular stable update channel. > > Ok, thanks for the clarification. I absolutely agree, but didn't want to go > ahead without asking. > > > However, am I correct that this is a regression in the DSA for > > acpi-support (0.140-5+deb7u3)? If so, we can fix it through stable > > security since it's a regression introduced in that channel. > > Nope, I don't think this is a regression. I'm pretty sure the same problem > applies to the original stable version. Given the above and that this was not introduced via a DSA, you can go ahead and ask for an update trough stable-proposed-update. Keep in mind that the window is closing this weekend IIRC. Regards, Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
