On 31-Aug-2011, Joachim Breitner wrote: > […] I pointed it out to them that it would be nice if the license > could be included in the source repo itself: > https://github.com/DavidKinder/Inform6/issues/1
That report was closed the following year, without any explanation. Could you re-start the discussion, preferably on that same upstream bug report? If requests to get a clear grant of license are rejected, we should at least have a clear rationale from the copyright holder recorded at that bug report. (I neither have nor want a GitHub account). -- \ “I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at | `\ the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour …” —F. H. Wales, 1936 | _o__) | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
