On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 02:59:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I trust Intel will be contributing these upstream; I'm really reluctant > > to take out of tree patches due to the potential security implications > > (this is the same issue that means we don't use any of the out of tree > > assembly). zlib is network viaible so it's very important that the code > > is correct. > I have no idea what the plan for upstreaming this is. I fear they are rather > nonexistent. There has been some traffic on the list regarding optimisations recently though I've not checked to see if it's the same work.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
