Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> writes: > I,'d agree with that if all you had to specify was which sockets to > listen on.
> Most services however don't treat all sockets equally. > Web servers have entirely different vhost configuration per socket. Ah, yes, that's a good point. And that's a common configuration. > I believe slapd can have separate tls configurations per socket but it's > been a while since I've dived through the slapd configuration mess. Hm. That's possible, although I've never run into it in years of running slapd, which I think may point to it at least being uncommon. But yes, I think this... > Basically my claim is that socket activation is great for cases where > all the configuration about the socket can be specified in systemd and > dreadful elsewhere. ...is quite reasonable and is the sort of thing we should probably say in any systemd Policy statement. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
