Hi Aurelien,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: libtecla, bladerf, maude
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> it looks like the latest libtecla upload to unstable renamed
> libtecla1-dev into libtecla-dev. This has not been coordinated with
> the reverse-dependencies, so bladerf and maude are now unbuildable.
> Please don't do that.
You are right - this was a bad thing. However, it seems bladerf has
just adapted:
$ apt-cache showsrc bladerf | grep Build-Depends.*libtecla-dev
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake (>= 2.8.5), pkg-config, doxygen,
libusb-1.0-0-dev (>= 1.0.12) [linux-any], libusb2-dev [kfreebsd-any],
libtecla-dev, libncurses5-dev, help2man
> Now this has to be fixed. Either by reverting the change in libtecla,
> or by updating the build-dependencies in bladerf and maude. I let you
> choose what is the best. As the freeze is approaching please fix that
> within a week.
I'll upload a fixed maude today.
Thanks for noticing
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
