Ansgar, On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > and you want to go back to the packages built from src:openjpeg 1.5.2.
Correct. > However removing the binaries built from src:openjpeg2 would make > version number in unstable go backwards for these binary packages. > We don't want that. > > Please upload a higher version[1] of the packages before if you want to > keep them (even if built from a different source). > > [1] This might require an epoch for openjpeg (at least for the > affected binaries). In this order really necessary ? I do not have the time to upload 1:1.5.2 right now. However I plan on doing this over the week end. Would it be possible to still go ahead and have openjpeg 2.1.0 transition to testing. I'll go with an epoch upload ASAP, and depending on upstream response it may also include a CVE fix for an undisclosed issue (if that matters) Thanks & regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
