Package: argyll
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I noticed that argyll ships the following patch:
debian/patches/03_usb-db.diff
# Set ID_VENDOR and ID_MODEL acording to VID and PID
-TEST=="/lib/udev/usb-db", IMPORT{program}="usb-db %p"
+TEST=="/lib/udev/usb-db", IMPORT{builtin}="hwdb --subsystem=usb"
It's true that usb-db is history and no longer exists. But given that,
the patch doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
You are testing for /lib/udev/usb-db, which no longer exists, to then
run the hwdb builtin, which will never be run as the TEST will never be
true.
What's the purpose of this patch?
I see that you referenced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200185 in
this patch, so bringing Martin and Dimitri into the loop here.
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/argyll.git/tree/debian/patches/03_usb-db.diff
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages argyll depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-11
ii libicc2 2.12+argyll1.5.1-8
ii libimdi0 1.5.1-8
ii libjpeg8 8d1-1
ii libtiff5 4.0.3-10
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-24
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3
ii libxext6 2:1.3.2-1
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.3-1
ii libxrandr2 2:1.4.2-1
ii libxss1 1:1.2.2-1
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.3-1
Versions of packages argyll recommends:
ii libpam-systemd 215-4
ii udev 215-4
Versions of packages argyll suggests:
ii colord 1.2.1-1
pn gir1.2-colordgtk-1.0 <none>
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
