Package: procmail Version: 3.22-22 Severity: normal I'm not sure whether this should be considered a documentation error or an actual bug, but according to the procmailrc(5) manpage:
These regular expressions are *completely* compatible to the normal egrep(1) extended regular expressions. Yet, I could not get named character classes like [[:digit:]] to match instead of [0-9], while egrep(1) handles them just fine. (I wouldn't have been so surprised, were it not for the emphasis in the manpage statement. <g>) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages procmail depends on: ii libc6 2.19-11 Versions of packages procmail recommends: ii fetchmail 6.3.26-1 ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 2.11.1-1 procmail suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
