On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:19:12 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 09/23/2014 03:51 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > As far as I am concerned, I think the only mystery left to be > > investigated (and fixed) is: why didn't I get pinentry-gtk2 pulled in by > > dependency during the upgrade process? > > I'm not sure what we can do about debugging the upgrade process now, > though :( > > I'm inclined to close this bug report, unless you want to reassign it to > one of the other packages involved in picking the wrong pinentry.
The problem is: I am not sure which package I could reassign this report to... Unless you have an idea of what might have happened, I would say "never mind". Anyway, let's hear what Laurent has to say about the issue. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ fsck is a four letter word... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpW4VzKP9kkq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
