On Thursday, September 18 2014, I wrote: > I agree this would be a good feature :-). > > However, I investigated the code a little more and came to a few > conclusions. There is a bug in the current code, because the TTL's are > stored using "unsigned long" types, but when they get passed to the > caching mechanism, it gets converted to "int"
Sorry, I hit C-c C-c before finishing :-). Anyway, as I was saying, the current code converts "unsigned long" to "int", which is a problem itself. But the main problem is that the code doesn't seem to check if the cache entry should be infinite or not (as promised in the comment you mentioned). I will see if I can work on a patch for this. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
