Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> That sounds like a (serious) bug with apt... > >> Maybe the right thing is to re-assign the bug to apt. > > Not really. If experimental breaks, you keep both pieces.
Um, sure, but it _is_ a bug, right? That is, if apt moves to unstable in the current state (ABI change, no version change), then it will be officially broken. Since as far as I know, the entire purpose of experimental is to allow finding such bugs before hitting unstable, then it seems entirely sensible to assign the bug to apt -- there must be _some_ way of reporting experimental bugs, otherwise I'm not sure what the point is. [I suppose there may be some other way that using the BTS, but if so, I have no idea what it is, and of course that would raise the question "why not use the BTS?"]. -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
