Paul Menzel [2014-09-17 23:08 +0200]: > That is great, but it does not fix the error of broken upgrade path to > my knowledge. Users might experience that bug when systemd 215-4 > migrates to testing before systemd-shim 8-2.
Well yes, then systemd would be held back for upgrading until systemd-shim 8-2 lands. Isn't that pretty much what we are looking for? But can this happen in the first place? The newer systemd in unstable makes systemd-shim uninstallable in testing, so britney ought to hold back the systemd migration until systemd and systemd-shim can enter testing in lockstep. > In my opinion, unfortunately systemd needs to have a line similar to: > > Breaks: systemd-shim (<< 8-2) Now that we stopped having the "API gap" between unstable and experimental we could indeed do that. I'm a bit surprised that we need that in the first place though (see above). > Are you going to reassign to systemd or should I do it? If we need it, please go ahead. (I might have misunderstood how britney works) Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
