Hi Daniel, Ok, you are right. I adopted pdfcrack in January and the package is showed in old maintainer's DDPO[1].
I need to know if is right or not then I will can close the bug. Cheers, Eriberto [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=nacho%40debian.org 2014-09-16 13:18 GMT-03:00 Daniel Lintott <dan...@serverb.co.uk>: > > On 15/09/14 21:41, Daniel Lintott wrote: >> Ah... Now I see... it's being picked up as being co-maintained. At a >> guess this is caused by the change of maintainer causing two email >> address in one of the DDPO databases. > > Okay... I think I've unravelled what is happening here. > > Because you *used* to upload the package (which is still in stable) DDPO > picks you up as an uploader (highlighted in blue) > > Another example of this can be seen at [1] for the gns3 and dynamips > packages which I maintain now. > > So the question here is whether a prior maintainer should still see the > package listed in their DDPO, whilst there name is present on the a > version of the package that exists in Debian (e.g. in stable)? > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=e...@debian.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
