On 11/30/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right. Sorry for bothering you. > > Too bad the cheap (388k) and priority:standard package lpr must give > way to the expensive (4156k) and priority:extra package lprng, or worse.
I suspect that it would be fairly easy to code a "fake" lp that complies with the lsb requirements and would work with lpr; that might be the ideal solution over the long term. Chris
