On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2014-09-10 at 19:50 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:13:35PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Hi Salvatore,
> > >
> > > On Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > The tabular view clearly would need some improvement and making clear
> > > > where the fix is already, e.g. wheezy-security but not yet wheezy. I
> > > > try to explain. The version tracked on the individual CVE pages is
> > > > *correct* from the following point of view: A fix is in wheezy-security
> > > > already, but not yet accepted into the wheezy suite.
> > >
> > > thanks for explaining this here also, but as on IRC I wonder:
> > >
> > > for whom is that view useful?
> >
> > For noone, we already discussed that during the security team meeting
> > and we decided to fix the view as also described in your bug report.
> >
> > It's only that noone has come around to change this. But since you now
> > have experience with the code base... :-)
> >
> It's still important to have the data available because wheezy is what
> you get when you pick the latest install media.
But they also contain the security apt sources, so this is rather theoretical.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
