On 09/10/2014 06:08 AM, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: > Control: reassign -1 gnupg-agent > > Looks to me like this is #623539 [1] - > > - gnupg-agent-guys, what do you say? The solution to that bug isn't > very appealing to this problem... > > 1 - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623539
(fwiw, #623539 is assigned to gnome-keyring, not gnupg-agent) It seems also related to: https://bugs.debian.org/760237#203 the interaction between gpa and gpg-agent is suboptimal at best. I think gpa needs to at least be able to detect when it needs an agent and the agent is failing, and handle that more gracefully. This is true for gpa regardless of who is providing the listening socket for gpg-agent (though i completely agree that gnupg-agent and gnome-keyring really need to find a way to play better together). I'm not convinced by the reassignment of #761026 to gnupg-agent, and i think i would prefer it to be reassigned back to gpa for now. Unfortunately, i don't know how to convince gnome-keyring and gnupg-agent to play together well. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
