Control: tags -1 confirmed On 02/09/14 21:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Just took a quick look at this. Some comments: > > On 17/08/14 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Hi, >> >> About imagemagick transition: >> a. I have tried to compile every dependency [1] in pbuilder >> b. Every package work except: >> 1. gnudatalanguage has a dependency problem due to a virtual >> package (b-d uninstable) > > That's not in testing, so shouldn't be a problem. > >> 2. [pythonmagick] FTBFS with new (experimental) imagemagick >> version BUT a newer version is waiting from maintainer and will be >> uploaded when newer imagemagick hit unstable >> 3. libtuxcap does not work but is not on dependency list and I >> have carried a patch (does not use imagemagick only at configure time) >> 4. virtuoso-opensource FTBFS but work with a patch >> 5. nip2 FTBFS. I have not patches but I have found one non >> distributable file (lena) and one non free icc file trying to patch >> it. I could not do a NMU due to these problems > > > Those four have no rdeps so worst case the ones that can't be / don't get > fixed > in time get removed from testing. > >> 6. ruby-rmagick FTBFS but will be likely fixed by my imagmagick >> comaintener and ruby-rmagick maintainer vincent (here in cc). > > That would be a problem, but apparently it has been fixed now (#758435). > >> So i think it near green light for imagemagick > > I want to finish the hdf5 and libav transitions as there are many collisions. > Once those are done I think we can start this. I will let you know.
Go ahead, but please prepare a patch for nip2 for the FTBFS. You don't need to fix the other RC bugs, only the FTBFS problem matters for now. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
