Am 20.08.2014 14:50, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 20.08.2014 13:27, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: >> On 08/20/2014 10:12, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 at 13:24:34 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >>>> Two possible outcomes then >>>> >>>> 1/ Make systemd recommend/depend on dbus (recommend would probably be >>>> sufficient) >>> >>> According to the initial bug report, the base system is installed without >>> Recommends, so no, Recommends is not sufficient unless we arrange for d-i to >>> install dbus some other way. systemd already indirectly Recommends dbus, >>> for instance: >> >> Then we could also just make sure dbus is included in the base >> installation, i.e. increase its priority to either standard or >> important. > > Since systemd already depends on libdbus-1-3, I'd bump libdbus-1-3 to > important and dbus to standard. Does that sound ok?
Just a quick followup: Since systemd v209 and later no longer uses libdbus-1-3 and we plan to update systemd to v215 for jessie, I guess there is no longer a need to bump the priority of libdbus-1-3. Bumping dbus to standard still makes sense though. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
