On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:29:23PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:58:22 +0100 Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > This bug has been fixed upstream, and the fix is included in what you > > uploaded this Thursday. However, the package still doesn't build due > > to the symbols file listing architectures by hand. > > It looks like possibly, there was a regression, or else I misunderstood -- > the > latest version 2:4.10.7-1 still or again fails passing -m32 to gcc. I tried > applying the part of my patch to pass --enable-x32 to configure in > debian/rules, and it builds OK. But I get symbols > > + _PR_x86_64_AtomicAdd@Base 1.8.0.10 > + _PR_x86_64_AtomicDecrement@Base 1.8.0.10 > + _PR_x86_64_AtomicIncrement@Base 1.8.0.10 > + _PR_x86_64_AtomicSet@Base 1.8.0.10 > > instead of the x86 symbols you posted in your patch. (And incidentally, the > existing version of libnspr4_2:4.9.4-2+x32 on debian-ports/unreleased has the > x86_64 symbols as well.)
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:02:48PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Here's the debdiff for the updated nspr package I just uploaded to debian- > ports/unreleased. Not sure what changed, but I just tested: your new patch does work. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
