--- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Scott Anderson wrote:
> > I'm attaching the build log again.
>
> That one is *very* different. I didn't see the same errors in the
> first log you sent.
>
> Configure says you're missing iconv development files, which are in
> libc6-dev. (It also says you don't have jw installed, which is in
> docbook-utils, but your problem is probably another one.)
I was missing docbook-utils. I'm installing it now.
>
> Do you have libc6-dev installed?
>
# apt-cache policy libc6-dev
libc6-dev:
Installed: 2.3.5-8.1
Candidate: 2.3.5-8.1
Version table:
*** 2.3.5-8.1 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.3.5-8 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
2.3.2.ds1-22 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
> The actual error you're having in the build seems to imply one of:
> - GnomePilotRecord isn't defined correctly (for example
> libgnome-pilot2-dev isn't installed)
# apt-cache policy libgnome-pilot2-dev
libgnome-pilot2-dev:
Installed: 2.0.12-1.4
Candidate: 2.0.12-1.4
Version table:
*** 2.0.12-1.4 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.0.12-1.2 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
> - unpack_Address isn't defined correctly (for example libpisock-dev
> isn't installed)
>
libpisock-dev:
Installed: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
Candidate: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
Version table:
*** 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.11.8-15 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
0.11.8-12 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
0.11.8-10 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
> Evolution build-depends on both of these, I suppose you have them
> installed, however they were uploads of libpisock-dev recently:
> <http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pilot-link.html>
>
> Could you try downgrading pilot-link packages? What version are you
> using?
I'll try downgrading pilot-link to unstable.
# apt-cache policy pilot-link
pilot-link:
Installed: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
Candidate: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
Version table:
*** 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.11.8-15 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
0.11.8-12 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
0.11.8-10 0
900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
> If you know of any upstream patch for this problem, send it in.
>
From: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/2005-September/msg00054.html
On 9/8/05, Bob Kashani <bobk ocf berkeley edu> wrote:
...
The pilot-link-0.12 patches are now in garnome-2.12.0 so all you need to
do is uncomment the PATCHFILES line in evolution, gnome-pilot, and
gnome-pilot-conduits and roll on... :)
Bob
...
==> Running checksum on port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff
*** GAR GAR GAR! port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff not in checksums file! GAR GAR
GAR! ***
make: *** [checksum-port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff] Error 1
Looks like you have to manually add the checksum unless I missed something
$ md5sum download/port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff >> checksums
Norm
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
