Package: autopkgtest Version: 3.4 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
We're looking at adding autopkgtest support to the ~3000 packages maintained by the pkg-perl team. As these packages are generally very similar to each other, we expect to come up with generic tests that cover 90% or 95% of these, so that only a small minority of the packages need to be customized. While there's no avoiding having to do source uploads of all the packages for this [1], we'd like to find a way to do it so that future changes to these generic tests or adding new tests don't require touching each source package. A few levels of indirection seems to get us pretty close to this [2], but having an 'include' directive of some sort in debian/tests/control would offer a cleaner and more extensible interface. I'm thinking of something like Include: <binary-package> /some/file which would make autopkgtest install <binary-package> and read /some/file for test definitions. This would mean that new tests would only need changes to <binary-package>, and be picked up by the other packages automatically. Does this make sense? Is it hard to add new keywords to the test metadata language? I'm not sure if there are other consumers that would need to be changed too. [1] Antonio Terceiro is setting up a shortcut for us on ci.debian.net, but longer term I suppose we want proper test control fields in the packages [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2014/08/msg00077.html Many thanks for your work, -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org