On ven., 2014-08-22 at 08:23 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, > > > The upower-0.99 port of xfpm 1.3 (in experimental) seems to take a > > BTW, *why* not simply build xfpm 1.3 for sid?
Because 1.3 is a development branch. In case 1.4 is released (and is stable enough) before the freeze, that's definitely a plan. > Anything speaking against this one which I haven't seen? That's not the way things work. -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
