On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 06:51:47PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> And I see nothing suggesting it is a "desktop use". Yes qemu has X11
> interface
> or two. It does not make it "desktop-only" or "more desktop oriented", but
> it makes it useful on desktop _too_.
Yes, there's no doubt that making it possible to have a virtual machine with
a graphical and sound environment is also useful, but there's people out
there that run a fair few virtual servers with no need for such things.
That two have already stepped forward to tell you this is likely an
indication that there's plenty of us out there.
> Speaking of making it optional - are you saying about making it modular may
> be, or letting qemu to dynamically load libs instead of be linked with these
> libs? I don't understand how packaging system is supposed to help here.
The software should be organized in such a way that makes it possible to
package the various features separately.
Nobody's saying /you/ have to fix this :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
