On 08/15/2014 06:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Sounds good to me. But do we really need to do b)? Or just document in > the code how to do it if you need to see the difference ... yagni?
(without having tried^diffed the two outputs) the idea would be that you would only see a line: W: automatically excluding packages: libdb5.1 (or something like that) in the current case, and if that package is gone from testing eventually, you wouldn't see anything anymore at all. imho lb should get rid of all embedded magics in lb, and when we keep one, it should 'show' itself when it's active. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
