Sebastian Ramacher a écrit , Le 13/08/2014 01:46: > Hi > > On 2014-08-13 01:23:06, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:57:27 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher >> <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Source: jhdf >>> Version: 2.9-2 >>> Severity: serious >>> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the >>> past) >> >> jhdf wasn't expected to build on kfreebsd-* because of the versioned >> Build-depends on default-jdk (>= 1:1.6). But since the epoch bump of >> default-jdk this test now matches 2:1.5. I've fixed that in >> debian/control and uploaled to unstable. But I have no idea how to get >> existing binary packages removed from testing/kfreebsd-*. Any idea? > > reportbug ftp.debian.org > > and ask for a removal of the binaries from kfreebsd-*.
Will do that, thanks. > But if they are not > supposed to build on kfreebsd-* anyway, why are they Architecture: any? > Apparently they should be Architecture: linux-any. Actually it is supposed to build on architectures with a JDK >= 1.6. Then it makes more sense to keep Architecture: any for the case when kfreebsd-* have JDK >= 1.6 in the future. Thanks, _g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
