On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> User: ftp.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertag: rm
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vch...@debian.org, pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Vincent Cheng <vch...@debian.org> writes:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters
>> <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>>> An exception was raised while processing the package:
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 98, in
>>> wrapper
>>> function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
>>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 150, in
>>> comment_accept
>>> transaction.copy_source(upload.source, suite,
>>> source_component_func(upload.source), allow_tainted=allow_tainted)
>>> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 142, in
>>> source_component_func
>>> .join(Component).one()
>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line
>>> 2193, in one
>>> "Multiple rows were found for one()")
>>> MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one()
>>
>> Was redeclipse-data rejected because of an issue with the package
>> (please explain), or is dak just not having a good day (should I
>> re-upload the package)?
>
> There is a bug in dak that doesn't allow having a package in two
> components at once. So redeclipse{,-data} need to be removed from the
> archive before they can move to main.
Ah, thanks for the explanation! In that case, yes, please remove
redeclipse and redeclipse-data from the archive.
Is there a certain delay required before re-uploading the package,
once removed? I recall that nvidia-settings had to removed and
reuploaded more than once to transition from contrib -> main
(#749173), and I don't quite understand why that was necessary.
Regards,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
