Hi Eloy, 2014-08-02 18:43 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris <pe...@chapus.net>: > On 08/01/2014 05:24 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> 2014-08-01 8:34 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: >>> >>> 2014-08-01 4:07 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris <pe...@chapus.net>: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:21:18PM -0400, Eloy Paris wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> So 1.12.0 is now out. It's a bit late but I just uploaded to >>>>> experimental a new version of netexpect that builds against the >>>>> Wireshark packages in experimental. Please let me know when you upload >>>>> the final 1.12 packages to unstable and I'll follow suit with the >>>>> corresponding netexpect packages to unstable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Looks like I screwed up when I built and my packages ended up unstable >>>> instead of experimental. If you are uploading your 1.12 packages soon >>>> then this should not be a problem. Otherwise I'd have to re-upload the >>>> old packages after playing some games with the version number. Gggr. >>> >>> No problem, I'll upload wireshark today or on the weekend. >> >> Done. :-) >> > > Thanks Bálint. > > It looks like I have some issues, though, because the autobuilders are > having problems building netexpect 0.22-1 against the new Wireshark 1.12 > packages. It's strange because I was able to build i386 packages, which are > what I uploaded into unstable. > > I'll look into it this weekend. According to the build logs 0.22-1 failed with wiresark 1.10.8-1, thus a binNMU may be enough.
Cheers, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
