On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Bill Allombert, 2014-07-30] > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > Would that description be OK: > > > > > > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > > > > > > > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second > > > > this ? > > > > > > I second the above description. > > > > > > I (co-)maintain uwsgi, which is capable of serving HTTP (via Apache2 but > > > also) on its own, and handle (a lot of protocols including) WSGI. > > > > > > On a related note, it probably makes sense to add similar note for PSGI > > > and maybe other protocols too (not sure how widespread other ones are), > > > but that's outside the scope of this bugreport, I guess. > > > > Thanks Jonas. Piotr and Stefan, you still did not say whether it was OK for > > you. > > looks good to me (although most packages providing httpd-wsgi will > provide plugins to actual web servers most probably, but it's close > enough for me)
That will do, thanks. I commited this change to the GIT repository. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
