On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwer...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 15:30 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 27.07.2014 10:23, Martin Erik Werner wrote: >> [...] >> > As far as I see it, it is still uncertain whether redeclipse-data >> > belonging in main is a correct assumption, a re-review of the content >> > would be needed, from the previous discussion I think it is indeed >> > *probable* that it would be found fit for main. >> >> I have reviewed redeclipse and redeclipse-data file-by-file. The patches >> are now attached to this bug report. The licenses are DFSG-free and >> there is not a single file that wouldn't abide by the rules. The only >> thing I noticed was a missing license paragraph about a few public >> domain images which I have added to debian/copyright. The paragraph >> about the Play* fonts could be removed because it appears you moved the >> font to a separate package, fonts-play. Otherwise the copyright file was >> accurate. > > Thank you for the review, it is very much appreciated! Both font and P-D > corrections looks correct (I previously think I let the P-D stuff fall > through to the Files: * CC-BY-SA glob since they had been modified in > Red Eclipse), but I think this makes more sense on second thought. > > I have pushed your changes to the git repos for redeclipse. > > Anyone up for sponsoring redeclipse and redeclipse-data for this change?
Sure, put it on the team sponsor queue [1] and I'll take a look at it eventually (before the freeze, at worst) if nobody else does. Regards, Vincent [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Games/Sponsors/Queue -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
