On Jul/23, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Package name : perf-tools > > Please choose a different name so that it won't be mistaken for > linux-tools. Perhaps 'perf-tools-unstable'.
Sure, I can do that: I'll re-upload it to NEW with another name. > > Many of these tools employ workarounds so that functionality is > > possible on existing Linux kernels. Because of this, many tools have > > caveats (see man pages), and their implementation should be > > considered a placeholder until future kernel features, or new > > tracing subsystems, are added. > > Based on the description, it doesn't appear that this would be > suitable for a stable release. So after uploading it, please open an > RC bug to ensure that it does not transition to testing. As long as the caveats/missing features are properly documented in the manpages (which, as far as I can tell, they are), why wouldn't this package be suitable for testing ? Cheers, --Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
