in-line :-
On 7/22/14, Pedro Beja <altha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Shirish,
Hey Pedro/althaser,
> Could you please still reproduce this issue with newer nautilus version
> like 3.12.2-1 ?
This one works.
One query though. The accessed time-stamp should have the time-stamp
of the last time a file was accessed/used. Am I correct ?
For e.g. I have a media file. Say big buck bunny
big_buck_bunny_1080p_h264.mov whose modification date is 07/22/2014
20:50 (the time I touched it) but I'm viewing it now at 22:52,
shouldn't the access time change to 22:52.
Please let me know if my understanding is correct or not.
> it seems to be fine here with 3.12.2-1. There are modified and accessed
> columns.
As shared above, the modification time column works good . I *think*
what was happening at the time I reported either touch was not
happening correctly or nautilus was not showing the correct descending
order in respect to time-stamps.
I touched couple of files and indeed the time-stamps changed and they
came to the top of the list in nautilus.
> thanks
> regards
> Pedro
Looking forward to the answer of my query if you have time, otherwise
the bug is fixed.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
