On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/07/14 21:33, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > That worked in the sense of turning off the display of errors.
> > But it feels like turning off a saftey mechanism.
> >
> > I am trying to contact the upstream for his advise.
>
> As I said, that is what you are already doing with wxwidget2.8, as that
> disables
> all the assertions for you! So building against wxwidgets3.0 with -DNDEBUG
> isn't
> a regression. Of course it would be better to not do that and fix all those
> assertions, and it is great that upstream is no longer hiding those problems.
> But we shouldn't block on that. A bugfix release with fixes for those can come
> at any moment.
With my wx maintainer hat on, I definitely agree. It would be nice to
fix these assertions, but it doesn't make sense to hold up the
wxwidgets3.0 or libwxsqlite3-3.0-0/auto-wxsqlite3 transitions while
you or upstream look into them.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
