This one time, at band camp, Thomas Lange said: > >>>>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:41:18 +0100, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> said: > > > read-write object the user can modify and update... It belongs either to > > /var or /srv (the latter I prefer, as it is clearly data for a service > > exposed by the system). > My future plans are to move it to /srv, but the question is, if it's really a > FHS violation. I'm also wondering, why there are currently no Debian > packages using /srv. I hesitate to be the first package using /srv.
My understanding is that while /srv is the right place for this kind of data, it would be incorrect for Debian packages to dump stuff there. /srv is the domain of the local admin. I suppose that shipping it somewhere with a note to the effect that it should be put in /srv might be one way to go, although it seems less than optimal. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
