On Sunday, July 13, 2014 03:08:55 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@debian.org> (2014-07-07): > > On Sat, 05 Jul 2014, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > > ❦ 4 mai 2014 09:15 +0200, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> : > > > >> There is another problem on sparc that makes the build fail but it > > > >> succeeds on s390x. I still have to figure out the remaining bug on > > > >> sparc but it seems quite complex (and related to libffi). > > > > > > > > Since sparc is now removed from the list of supported architectures, > > > > the > > > > patch should fix the problem (or use the 0.8.2 version which also > > > > fixes > > > > the problem). > > > > > > Could you consider applying the patch or update to 0.8.2? > > > > Just to make sure, forwarding/replying to Stefano (since I find myself > > often also loosing track on which reports to pay closer attention for > > team maintained packages) > > Hi, > > bumping severity since the s390x FTBFS is keeping snimpy in the > BD-Uninstallable state. If you disagree, feel free to lower the severity > of this bug report again, but then file a serious bug against snimpy > since it can no longer be built on s390x. > > [ JFTR this bug report was marked pending on Wed, 22 Jan 2014 so bumping > severity to make sure this package is acted on looks like the best > course of action. But of course, I'm an outsider and I could be utterly > wrong. ] > > Mraw, > KiBi.
I hope you're not wrong. I just uploaded this. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
