On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Patrick Schleizer <adrela...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Hi bastien!
>
> Thank you for taking this!
>
>> Could we get a tag description ?
>
> package-depends-recommends-on-apparmor
>
>> Something what would explain why and how to fix your package ?
>
> Package must neither depend nor recommend apparmor, because it would not
> only enable AppArmor for this package, but for any packages shipping an
> AppArmor profile, which might have unwanted effects. Enabling AppArmor
> should require at least one conscious decision by the user.
>
> Removing apparmor dependency or recommendation will fix this error.
>
> If you are shipping an AppArmor profile, add apparmor to Suggests.
>
> If there is a valid reason for this dependency or recommendation, please
> override the tag.
>
>> Moreover it seems that I should whitelist:
>> apparmor-{utils,profiles,profiles-extra}
>
> Please do.
>
> [Feel free to change tag / explanation. I don't have a strong opinion
> there. Whatever you feel appropriate.]Could you also open a bug agaisnt policy ? It will help to have reference. Bastien > Cheers, > Patrick > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
