Control: retitle 754737 strip incorrect license from generated protocol docs
bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> writes: > docs/protocol.html > docs/protocol.txt > Are teechnically dual licensed and not only under all permissive license > (even if in pratice it is all permissive so severity wishlist) > Please correct this point in debian/copyright. I apologize for the difficulty this my cause for your audits, but no, I'm not going to do this. Speaking as upstream, the correct license is the all-permissive license, and the other license is purely an artifact of the tool used to generate this document. I am not going to give the other license any official presence or acknowledgement since I don't consider it the correct license, and there's no reason to ever use that license instead of the all-permissive license. The ideal solution would be for xml2rfc to gain an option or processing directive that tells it not to insert that license, or for someone to write post-processing code to remove the incorrect license information from the generated file. I will leave this bug open as wishlist for that work. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
