On 13 July 2014 at 04:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
| Control: severity -1 serious
| 
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> (2012-04-01):
| > I also ran this by upstream, given that there were some changes to the
| > .C() interface in R lately.  But upstream couldn't tickle anything
| > here either, so I suspect this is s390 / s390x specific.
| 
| In the meanwhile, a successful build happened, so the s390x FTBFS is now
| a regression, meaning your package can't migrate. Adjusting severity
| accordingly.
| 
| Build history on s390x:
|   https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rggobi&arch=s390x
| 
| (Long story short, 1 single successful build: 2.1.19-2)

Could we just exclude s390x for builds of rggobi? 

There is little that I can point Michael (upstream; already CC'ed) to. The
package fails after successfully compiling and linking when trying to load;
that usually means an x11 issue of some sort.  Could be a font metric; I have
no idea.

ggobi (the binary) and rggobi (the R package using it) are pretty stable; it
would be a shame to loose either (or just rggobi) from the release over this.
But if that were the worst case I could live with that too.  This is a 
somewhat tangential package, and if there are users on s390x they can also
install it from CRAN ...

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to