Quoting Justin B Rye (justin.byam....@gmail.com): > Neil Williams wrote: > > I did ask for a template review whilst the package was still in NEW: > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2014/06/msg00009.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2014/06/msg00010.html > > > > However, I wasn't CC'd on the only reply, despite that reply asking > > specific questions about the package.
Doh, sorry, I completely missed that call for review. It came out in a moment I wasn't very focused on Debian mailing lists, sorry. > > Sorry - but the general mailing list Code of Conduct does say not to > CC the original poster unless specifically requested. Except that I > often do that anyway; you were just unlucky that I didn't notice it > might be needed. From what I read your answer proposed a few changes but indeed no revised template. So, should we start from the current one in the package?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
