Julia support for LLVM 3.4 is only experimental and we will probably go directly to 3.5.
Is it an option to include 3.3 in the Julia package in that case? -viral On 6 Jul 2014 23:49, "Sylvestre Ledru" <sylves...@debian.org> wrote: > On 07/07/2014 00:12, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Le dimanche 06 juillet 2014 à 23:55 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > > > > > >> Le dimanche 06 juillet 2014 à 19:39 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > >>> Source: julia > >>> Severity: important > >>> I would like to remove llvm-toolchain-3.3 from the archive ASAP. > >>> Could you switch to llvm-3.4-dev? > >> Unfortunately upstream does not officially support LLVM 3.4 yet, not > >> even for the latest development sources (it seems to compile, but there > >> are issues, like https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6369 ). For > >> the current stable release (0.2) that is in sid, it is even worse, since > >> julia FTBFS due to LLVM API changes. > >> > >> So at the very least I have to package a development snapshot. I need to > >> get several new build dependencies through NEW, so it will take some > >> time. Hopefully that will be done before the jessie freeze. > > Looking at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6757, it seems that > > even the next major release of Julia (0.3) will still require LLVM 3.3 > > to be fully functional. > > > > Would that be acceptable for you to ship LLVM 3.3 in Jessie? > > > Not really ... I am planning to ship with llvm 3.4 & 3.5. > I don't want to third instance just for a single package. > > Sylvestre > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-julia-devel mailing list > pkg-julia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel >
