On Tue, 01 Jul 2014, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > No, it's not fine. Buildds only consider the first alternative, so if > > libtiff4-dev no longer exists, the package won't be able to build on the > > buildds. > and with your argument reopening those just closed issues ;) > but for now with normal severity since FTBFS is not factual yet > (libtiff4-dev is still there). I will swap the order of those > in build-depends -- pbuilder iirc is a bit "smarter", so hopefully there > would be no issues in building those backports we care about in > neurodebian bleh -- but I just can't because then they will FTBFS now since there is no libtiff-dev yet in the archive... so I will just let the time get ripe I guess and do nothing meanwhile -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
