On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 29/06/14 19:31, Guo Yixuan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > >> On 2014-06-29 05:34, Guo Yixuan (郭溢譞) wrote: > >>> Package: release.debian.org > >>> Severity: normal > >>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > >>> Usertags: transition > >>> > >>> Dear Release Team, > >>> > >>> We're planning to upload a new version of librime, which has ABI/API > >>> breaks. The affected packages are few, and all under IME team's > >>> maintenance, and we're mostly ready to have sourceful upload for > >>> these packages: > >>> > >>> Source: fcitx-rime > >>> Source: ibus-rime > >>> > >>> Ben file: > >>> > >>> [...] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Could you please upload the new version of librime to experimental? > >> This should automatically generate a simple tracker for your (called > >> auto-librime). > >> > >> ~Niels > > > > Osamu just helped to upload it (to unstable), so it's now in the new > > queue. [1] > > Please next time upload to experimental when you're asked to do so. In this case > it's fine, I verified that there are no conflicts with other transitions, so > there's no need to cancel the upload.
Thank you! > Why did you rename the -dev package from librime-dev to librime1-dev? Having an > unversioned -dev package (e.g. librime-dev) is generally preferred. A versioned > one makes sense when there are two versions of the library simultaneously, but > that is not the case here. The renaming is due to a backward-incompatible API change in librime 1.0, where some struct members changed types. So I followed the recommendation here.[1] [1] https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices Yixuan
