Dear Jacko, thanks for your answer and time
> The fonts in the OTF format, however, we considered "new" ones > (note, e.g., that they have Unicode tables and that they are equipped > with the OTF typografic features, both absent from the original > Adobe fonts) and, therefore, following Adobe's recommendations > for the glyph naming in new fonts (see the mentioned by Karl Agreed. > 2. Does it make really sense to make a step > backward and revert to the old-style names in the OTF No. I disagree here. Poppler should be fixed. > TeX Gyre fonts (including TeX Gyre Math)? It is feasible, > but we are rather reluctant to introduce such a change, Indeed, and I do *not* want you to make this step. As Kalr pointed out, either we leave it like it is now, and get poppler do be reasonable, or adding another fake glyph fi/f_i, but not changing names, this is not a good idea. Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
