We have accumulated the following GR proposals, mostly to do with TC matters:
* Fix the supermajority bug. Status: draft text on -vote just sent. * Change the committee size to an odd number to minimise use of the casting vote in highly contested situations. Status: under discussion; text should be simple. Current proposal is to increase to 9. * Set a minimum discussion period for the TC (probably 72h). Under discussion within the TC. * Retirement/rotation of TC members. Proposals being discussed on -project, at a fairly advanced stage of maturity. * Explicitly permit the TC to hold private conversations. These would not include actual votes etc., and are still discouraged. Draft text is ready. * Fix the numbering in appendix A so there is only one A.1. Draft text is ready. I would like to know which if any of these are (a) controversial (b) are related to the others. It would probably be best to lump the uncontroversial ones together into one GR proposal. The others should be separate, unless any of them are entangled. By entangled I mean that a voter's opinion about one of the proposals might depend on whether the other proposal passes. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
